A specific type of aggressive immune cell (CD57+ CD8 T cell) is linked to lung scarring in systemic sclerosis and may help explain why some patients develop serious lung disease.
Researchers found more of a distinct group of CD8 T cells (called CD57+ effector memory T cells) in the blood of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients who have interstitial lung disease (ILD) compared with SSc patients without lung disease and with healthy people.These CD57+ cells showed signs of having expanded from a few family lines of cells (clonal expansion), which suggests they were being strongly activated over time, like a small army growing from a few recruits.The CD57+ cells act as cytotoxic cells, meaning they can kill other cells; their killing activity is increased when they meet a partner protein called CD155 on other cells that connects to the receptor CD226 on the T cell—think of CD155 as the green light that makes these T cells more aggressive.The same CD57+ cells were seen directly in lung tissue from SSc-ILD patients, supporting the idea that these cells move from blood into the lung and may be involved where scarring happens.Analysis of other public lung data pointed to blood vessel lining cells (endothelial cells) in the lung as a likely source of CD155, which could help activate the CD57+ T cells locally and contribute to ongoing lung injury.
People with systemic sclerosis and their caregivers should care because this work suggests a specific immune cell may help cause the lung scarring that leads to breathing problems; knowing this can steer future tests and treatments.If a doctor can test for higher levels of these CD57+ cells in blood, it might help identify patients at higher risk for lung damage earlier—like spotting a small leak before a pipe bursts.This may matter for treatment choices: therapies that reduce these aggressive T cells or block the CD155–CD226 interaction could potentially slow lung scarring, similar to removing the spark that keeps a small fire going.Care teams—doctors, nurses, and rehab specialists—can use this information to watch at-risk patients more closely for early signs of ILD and consider referral for lung tests sooner.Researchers and clinicians developing new treatments will benefit most because the study points to a clear target (the CD57+ cells or their activation signal) that could be tested in future clinical trials.
The study shows an association (these cells are linked to lung disease) but does not prove that these cells directly cause the scarring; other factors could also be involved.Most findings come from blood tests and tissue samples from a limited number of patients and public datasets, so results need confirmation in larger, diverse patient groups before changing care.Even if these cells are important, treatments targeting them are not yet available; discussion with your doctor is necessary before making any changes based on this research.
12/31/2026
Learn how certain gut bacteria can worsen MS symptoms and what this means for treatment and daily li
Read More5/1/2026
Study finds CD29 marks blood B cells that can enter the brain and become antibody-producing cells in
Read More5/1/2026
Study finds early detection, lower spinal fluid virus, and PML‑IRIS relate to better 1‑year outcomes
Read More5/1/2026
Study found fewer hospital diagnoses of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis during COVID-19, b
Read More3/1/2026
Study shows C5 inhibitors given during or soon after NMOSD attacks helped most patients stabilize or
Read More3/1/2026
Early OCT eye scans can often distinguish MOGAD from NMOSD optic neuritis, helping guide faster trea
Read MoreWhether you’ve recently been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or are seeking to broaden your understanding of this complex, neurodegenerative disease, navigating the latest research can feel overwhelming. Studies published in respected medical journals like The Journal of clinical investigation often range from early-stage, exploratory work to advanced clinical trials. These evidence-based findings help shape new disease-modifying therapies, guide symptom management techniques, and deepen our knowledge of MS progression.
However, not all research is created equal. Some clinical research studies may have smaller sample sizes, evolving methodologies, or limitations that warrant careful interpretation. For a more comprehensive, accurate understanding, we recommend reviewing the original source material—accessible via the More Details section above—and consulting with healthcare professionals who specialize in MS care.
By presenting a wide range of MS-focused studies—spanning cutting-edge treatments, emerging therapies, and established best practices—we aim to empower patients, caregivers, and clinicians to stay informed and make well-informed decisions when managing Multiple Sclerosis.