If certain immune cells do not rise in a routine blood test after starting natalizumab, it may be a sign that the MS treatment needs a closer check.
Natalizumab helps keep immune cells from entering the brain and spinal cord, so more of these cells usually remain in the blood. In a clinical trial, blood counts generally rose within 12 weeks for people taking the drug, but not for people taking a placebo, which had no active drug. The rise was also absent in people who kept making antibodies against natalizumab—proteins that can block the treatment. A clear rise in immune cells helped researchers identify people who did not have these antibodies. The researchers also examined records from an MS clinic to explore how blood counts related to antibodies, drug levels, and MS activity.
People starting natalizumab may benefit from asking their MS team how their blood counts compare with their count before treatment. A blood count is a routine test, so it may offer an early clue without waiting for new MS symptoms. If the expected rise is missing, a clinician may consider a separate test for antibodies against the drug. Caregivers can help by keeping track of test results and bringing questions to appointments. For care teams, this clue could help them decide when to check whether the treatment is working as expected.
A missing rise in immune cells is a clue, not proof that someone has antibodies or that treatment has failed. The blood-count pattern needs to be compared with a count taken before treatment, so one result alone may not tell the full story. The study suggests this approach could lead to earlier antibody testing, but it does not show that using it prevents new MS activity.
AI-generated summary — for informational purposes only, not medical advice
11/1/2026
Researchers compared blood from people with childhood-onset MS and healthy volunteers. They found DN
Read More11/1/2026
In 24 people with severe MS, stem cell treatment lowered signs of inflammation and nerve damage for
Read More11/1/2026
A review of 49 studies finds special brain scans can detect MS-related inflammation, but scan method
Read More11/1/2026
In a study of 294 pregnancies, MS flare-ups were uncommon after pausing two treatments. Learn what t
Read More10/17/2026
A Korean study found other immune conditions were more common before MS diagnosis. Learn what this m
Read More10/17/2026
Why do some people with MS skip thinking tests? Learn what a study of 334 people found about anxiety
Read MoreWhether you’ve recently been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or are seeking to broaden your understanding of this complex, neurodegenerative disease, navigating the latest research can feel overwhelming. Studies published in respected medical journals like Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) often range from early-stage, exploratory work to advanced clinical trials. These evidence-based findings help shape new disease-modifying therapies, guide symptom management techniques, and deepen our knowledge of MS progression.
However, not all research is created equal. Some clinical research studies may have smaller sample sizes, evolving methodologies, or limitations that warrant careful interpretation. For a more comprehensive, accurate understanding, we recommend reviewing the original source material—accessible via the More Details section above—and consulting with healthcare professionals who specialize in MS care.
By presenting a wide range of MS-focused studies—spanning cutting-edge treatments, emerging therapies, and established best practices—we aim to empower patients, caregivers, and clinicians to stay informed and make well-informed decisions when managing Multiple Sclerosis.