Simple ultrasound scans of muscles and nerves can sort ALS patients into two clear groups — one with milder changes and better function, and one with more severe muscle damage and worse function.
Researchers used noninvasive ultrasound to measure muscle size, how bright the muscle looks on the scan (echogenicity), and nerve size in 454 people with ALS. The measurements grouped patients into two reliable groups: a Mild group with healthier-looking muscles and a Severe group with thinner, brighter (more damaged) muscles. People in the Severe group had lower scores on the ALS Functional Rating Scale (a test of daily abilities like walking, dressing, and breathing), meaning they had more trouble in daily life. The Severe group also had weaker manual muscle tests and lower electrical muscle signals, which match the ultrasound signs of damage. The two-group split was stable when researchers tested different ways of grouping, suggesting this method is repeatable and meaningful.
People living with ALS and their caregivers should care because ultrasound could give a clear, quick picture of how much muscle is affected, like getting a snapshot of road damage before planning repairs. Clinicians and therapists may use this information to tailor care — for example, prioritizing mobility aids, home changes, or therapy for those in the Severe group. Researchers running clinical trials could use these groups to make sure treatments are tested in similar patients, which helps see if a treatment really works. Family members can better plan for care needs if they know whether a loved one falls into a milder or more severe category. Overall, this tool could help make monitoring more objective and guide day-to-day decisions about treatment and support.
This study looked at patients from specific clinics and time periods, so results might differ in other places or groups. Ultrasound findings were linked to function, but that doesn’t prove the scans cause changes in ability — they just match what is already happening. Also, while the grouping was stable in this study, doctors must combine ultrasound with clinical judgment and other tests before making major care decisions.
12/31/2026
Learn how certain gut bacteria can worsen MS symptoms and what this means for treatment and daily li
Read More5/1/2026
Study finds CD29 marks blood B cells that can enter the brain and become antibody-producing cells in
Read More5/1/2026
Study finds early detection, lower spinal fluid virus, and PML‑IRIS relate to better 1‑year outcomes
Read More5/1/2026
Study found fewer hospital diagnoses of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis during COVID-19, b
Read More3/1/2026
Study shows C5 inhibitors given during or soon after NMOSD attacks helped most patients stabilize or
Read More3/1/2026
Early OCT eye scans can often distinguish MOGAD from NMOSD optic neuritis, helping guide faster trea
Read MoreWhether you’ve recently been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or are seeking to broaden your understanding of this complex, neurodegenerative disease, navigating the latest research can feel overwhelming. Studies published in respected medical journals like Journal of neurology often range from early-stage, exploratory work to advanced clinical trials. These evidence-based findings help shape new disease-modifying therapies, guide symptom management techniques, and deepen our knowledge of MS progression.
However, not all research is created equal. Some clinical research studies may have smaller sample sizes, evolving methodologies, or limitations that warrant careful interpretation. For a more comprehensive, accurate understanding, we recommend reviewing the original source material—accessible via the More Details section above—and consulting with healthcare professionals who specialize in MS care.
By presenting a wide range of MS-focused studies—spanning cutting-edge treatments, emerging therapies, and established best practices—we aim to empower patients, caregivers, and clinicians to stay informed and make well-informed decisions when managing Multiple Sclerosis.