MS Treatment: What Predicts Fewer Relapses Over Time?
By MS Buddy ·
Summarized from Journal of neurology, Oct 2026 · PubMed. AI-generated summary. Not medical advice.
Research by Stephan Bramow, Melinda Magyari and 17 colleagues at Copenhagen University Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital and 2 other institutions in Denmark.
Key Takeaway
In a Danish study, people with relapsing MS had fewer attacks during the first three years of cladribine treatment, but later disease activity was hard to predict.
What They Found
Cladribine is a treatment given in short courses of tablets. Before treatment, people in the study averaged about 0.55 relapses, or new symptom attacks, per year; during the first three years of treatment, that fell to about 0.23–0.25 per year. People under 45 and those with recent disease activity were more likely to have an attack or new changes on an MRI scan, which uses magnets to take pictures of the brain and spinal cord. Lasting worsening of disability was uncommon in the first three years and remained uncommon later, even among older people. After three years, more people began to show signs of disease activity, but the researchers could not reliably predict who would be affected.
Who Should Care and Why
If you take cladribine, these findings offer a reason to discuss how well it is working at each follow-up visit. If you have had a recent relapse or MRI changes, ask your MS team what those signs mean for your treatment plan. If you are older or have had no recent disease activity, the results may be encouraging, but they do not guarantee that MS will stay quiet. Caregivers can help by keeping track of new symptoms and upcoming appointments, much like keeping a maintenance log for a car. MS care teams can use this study to guide conversations, while continuing to check for changes over time.
Important Considerations
This study used records of people who received cladribine, so it cannot prove that the treatment alone caused the drop in relapses. Few people had lasting disability worsening, making it harder to tell whether cladribine prevents it. Because later disease activity was difficult to predict, regular follow-up still matters even if you feel well.
AI-generated summary — for informational purposes only, not medical advice
Read the original abstract
Published in Journal of neurology by et al.. Reproduced from the PubMed record.
Cladribine is regarded highly efficacious in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, prediction of treatment response and optimal management remain elusive, particularly during long-term. We screened the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry for patients with RRMS who received ≥2 5-day treatment cycles of cladribine and were followed for >90 days. Annualised relapse rates (ARR) and activity parameters (relapses or MRI activity) were analysed from 90 days after the first dose (index) to year 3 (short-term) together with time-to-first 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW), CDW independent of relapses (PIRA), and activity/CDW (loss of "no evidence of disease activity", NEDA-3). Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests were validated in a subgroup who completed ≥4 five-day cladribine cycles before year 3 and contributed with >3 years follow-up (3YFS). Predicting covariables included age (< /≥ 45 years), pre-baseline activity, and short-term NEDA-3 status regarding 3YFS outcomes beyond year 3 (long-term). ARR declined significantly from ~0.55 in the year pre-baseline to ~0.23-0.25 from index to year 3. Younger age and pre-baseline activity predicted more frequent short-term activity. Pre-baseline activity additionally predicted short-term NEDA-3 loss. Short-term findings were consistent in 3YFS patients. CDW and PIRA were rare during short-term (~ 10%) and long-term (~ 20%), even in older patients. However, during long-term, NEDA-3 loss resumed steadily and this was largely unpredictable. While cladribine showed sustained short-term efficacy, treatment response appeared more favourable in older patients and patients without pre-baseline activity. Rare CDW and PIRA events warrant more research in cladribine for disability prevention. Optimal long-term management following cladribine treatment requires more research.
Trials you could look into
This study looked at a treatment with MS trials currently recruiting or under way.
Listing a trial is not a recommendation. Eligibility is decided by the study team, and your neurologist is the person to ask first.
Explore more research
Related MS research
11/9/2026
A U.S. study found anxiety, depression, and pain more often in MS hospital stays. Learn why asking f
Read More11/6/2026
A study of children with MS linked higher propionate, a substance made in the gut, with less disease
Read More11/4/2026
A four-year MS study links the condition of nerve coating in brain lesions with later thinking speed
Read More11/3/2026
A study of two MS medicines found MRI scans may help confirm relapses and clarify treatment differen
Read More11/3/2026
A large MS records study found fewer Alzheimer’s diagnoses among people given natalizumab. Learn wha
Read More11/3/2026
MS symptoms can worsen even without relapses. Learn why walking tests may miss changes, and how trac
Read MoreNot all studies carry the same weight: sample size, study design and whether results were replicated all matter. The credibility score above reflects the journal, and the original paper is linked under More Details. Read how MS Buddy selects and scores research, and talk to your MS care team before acting on any study.
